Don’t Kill the Messenger!

A disturbing trend is the punishment of truth-tellers, or so-called Whistleblowers, for simply sharing information in regard to a morally and or legally questionable act. While living in the “Information Age,” this is obviously a hot issue, as many allegations are brought forth in reference to spilling state secrets and unintended sharing of valuable data. The world is a data mine, and tracking individuals and groups of people is a major facet of the security state. In fact, there is even a data mining industry, in which personal information is shared, largely in secret or in obfuscated terms, with commercial and security interests alike. The very notion of monitoring personal online trends and behaviors is a pressing issue that begs for further inquiry and debate. There are of course a plethora of ethical issues that may be raised, especially in regard to privacy and incrimination solely based off data collection. All to often people assume they have much more privacy online, when in fact most every click is recorded, at least in aggregate, somewhere.
The pattern of targeting whistleblowers for exposing dirty secrets instead of investigating the perpetrators of such offenses is a heinous crime. These heroic acts should not be punished, but encouraged and applauded. How could any population be confident in a shadow government, whose activities are largely blind to the citizenry? To do so is a severe mistake. At a time when privacy is seemingly more and more a relic of the past, the populous must take a stand now before everyone lives in a giant glass house. The internet as a whole must remain open and free for everyone to use, unless the grandest propaganda campaign be instituted in which all access to information and even communication first must pass through government filters.

*This will need to be continued, but I wanted to publish the post as is since I have been away from WordPress due to work and school




2 thoughts on “Don’t Kill the Messenger!”

  1. US government is filtering our sharing, for sure. Example: Recently, a story was covered by nearly every other English speaking news feed, but was absent from the US news cycle. It was the story of a man in Saudi Arabia who was beheaded AND crucified for his crime. The crime committed doesn’t matter, so much as the fact that this was not reported in US news feeds. Why? Because we in America don’t like to think that the civilized Saudi’s would act in such heinous ways, or is it our government who doesn’t want us to think they might. Syria, yes. Iran, sure. But Saudi Arabia? Never.

    We are being filtered, every day! Just the way it is in this technology fat age we live in, and won’t get any better any time soon.


    1. I have to agree with the exception of alternative media that can readily be found online. As far as major networks, that is a lost cause. However, only the people seeking a certain alternative will seek such sources and those who are either ignorant or just do not care will continue to be polluted by the official narratives.

      Thanks for the read and the comment.




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s